Not all new homes are built the same way. Here’s what to know before you break ground.
Most Popular New Home Building Techniques
Stick-built homes dominate the U.S. market – over 90% of new homes use this method.
Stick framing (or platform framing) uses stick-by-stick assembly of the skeleton of the home including wall studs, floor and ceiling joists, and roof trusses or rafters.
Panelized framing uses factory-built wall panels trucked to the site – same materials, just pre-assembled in a controlled environment.
Modular homes are built in sections in a factory, transported to your lot, and assembled there.
Light-gauge steel, Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs), thick foam panels sandwiched between OSB board, and Concrete systems are gaining popularity in specific regions or for performance builds.
Stick-Built vs. Prefabricated Homes
| Stick-Built | Prefabricated (Panelized/Modular) | |
| Build location | On-site | Factory + site assembly |
| Cost | Varies, but generally lower | Can be higher for modular |
| Timeline | Weather-dependent | Often faster, weather-protected |
| Design flexibility | High | Medium to high (modular limitations) |
| Insulation/Air sealing | Needs careful install | More controlled in factory builds |
Pros and Cons
| Type of Construction | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Stick Frame | Most popular, longstanding method; standardized, time-tested | Increasing lumber costs; lumber shrinkage causing insulation issues, drywall cracks |
| Modular | Faster build time; consistent quality; potential for energy efficiency | Design limited by transport size; quality varies by manufacturer; may carry stigma in resale |
| Light-Gauge Steel | Fire-, rot-, and termite-resistant; doesn't warp or shrink | Typically costs more; requires specialized labor; conducts heat, need thermal breaks for efficiency |
| Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs)Best for: High-efficiency homes with tight energy goals. | Superior insulation and air sealing; quick assembly; may reduce HVAC size and energy use | Higher material cost (but labor savings may offset it); limited contractor familiarity; requires precise planning |
Concrete Construction Methods
Used more in hurricane zones or for ultra-durable homes. Variants include:
CMU (Concrete Masonry Units):
Common in the South; slower heat transfer keeps homes cooler.
AAC (Autoclaved Aerated Concrete):
Lightweight blocks with built-in insulation; costs more.
ICFs (Insulated Concrete Forms):
Foam blocks filled with concrete—high insulation (R-20+), excellent storm resistance, quiet interiors.
Cons:
Higher upfront cost, heavier walls
Still usually combined with wood roof systems
Cost Comparison of Construction Methods
| Method | Est. Cost Impact vs. Stick-Built |
| Stick-built | Baseline |
| Panelized | ~Equal or slightly more |
| Modular | Varies; often more for high-quality |
| Steel | More upfront cost |
| SIPs | Material cost up, labor cost down |
| ICF/Concrete | More upfront cost |
Note: Regional costs, materials, and labor availability can swing pricing significantly.
Environmental Impact
Best: SIPs and ICFs – tight envelopes mean lower energy usage long-term
Good: Modular – less waste, factory efficiency
Moderate: Stick-built – more on-site waste, but recyclable lumber
Watch for: Steel – high embodied energy unless offset by performance gains
Best for Energy Efficiency
Top choices: SIPs, ICFs, high-quality modular builds
Why: These methods create tight, well-insulated homes that need less heating/cooling
Pro tip: A tight envelope matters more than the structure alone. Pair any method with quality insulation, windows, and mechanical systems.
Common Problems by Method
Stick-built: Warping lumber, poor air sealing
Modular: Inconsistent quality, shipping damage
Steel: Complicated insulation, harder wiring/plumbing
SIPs: Limited flexibility for changes, requires precision
Concrete: Slower builds, higher initial costs
Concrete vs. Wood Frame
Wood: Flexible, familiar, lower cost
Concrete: Stronger, more durable, better thermal mass
Verdict: Concrete offers long-term durability and storm resistance, but wood still leads for cost and availability.
How Long Does It Take?
| Method | Typical Timeline |
| Stick-built | 6–12 months |
| Modular | 4–8 months |
| SIPs | 6–10 months |
| ICF | 7–12 months |
Weather delays are less likely with prefab methods.
Next step: Talk to your builder about which methods they’ve mastered and what fits your priorities best.
Charlie Wardell
Charlie Wardell is a licensed builder and a writer and editor with more than 20 years of experience covering home building and construction.A Massachusetts resident, his work has appeared in some of the nation's leading media brands in print and online.In addition to his exclusive articles for NewHomeSource, Charlie has written or edited for publications that include Architectural Record, Custom Builder, Fine Homebuilding, Green Builder, Harvard Management Update, Popular Science and This Old House.