There are several different ways to do landscaping, but typically, it comes down to two competing approaches: xeriscaping and traditional landscaping.
Each method offers distinct advantages (and trade-offs) when it comes to considerations such as water use, upkeep, aesthetics, and sustainability.
For those building or buying a new home, the decision could shape long-term costs and ecological impact.
Here are some factors to consider when deciding whether you should xeriscape or landscape, and the key differences between the two.
1. Water Usage
Water consumption between xeriscaping and normal landscaping is the most obvious difference.
Xeriscaping: Relies on drought-tolerant plants and placement designed to reduce overall water usage, can significantly reduce outdoor water use in dry climates. Native plants, mulching, and efficient irrigation systems are central to this method, significantly easing the strain on your water bill.
Traditional landscaping, by contrast, often features expansive lawns and non-native plants that demand frequent watering, especially if you live in a hot or arid region. Automated sprinklers and hose-fed gardens make the maintenance of a regular lawn easier, but can drive up utility bills.
Takeaway: For water conservation, xeriscaping is the clear frontrunner.
2. Maintenance
Xeriscaping: Typically requires thoughtful planning and plant selection at the outset. Once established, however, it demands less maintenance overall: no weekly mowing, minimal pruning, and little weeding, thanks to dense planting and ground cover.
Traditional landscapes require more regular care: mowing, fertilizing, pest control, and seasonal upkeep are all important for a healthy lawn/garden. For homeowners who enjoy gardening or lawn work, that might be part of the appeal, but for others, it's a chore and a cost.
Takeaway: Xeriscaping offers lower maintenance in the long term.
Aesthetic Appeal
The look and feel of xeriscaping can vary widely. While it’s often associated with dry, desert-like visuals, modern xeriscaped yards can be vibrant and visually engaging, incorporating flowering native plants, gravel paths, and decorative stone. Its impact on resale value is typically lower than a traditional yard, but in certain climates, xeriscaped lawns can be an attractive addition.
Traditional landscaping leans toward lush green lawns, manicured hedges, and ornamental blooms, a style long favored in suburban developments. It boosts curb appeal through classic style and familiarity, and has a broader reach for those buyers unfamiliar with xeriscaping.
Takeaway: Aesthetics are subjective. Xeriscaping offers considerable variety; traditional yards provide a classic look. This one comes down to preference.
Environmental Impact
Environmentally, xeriscaping has clear advantages. By prioritizing native vegetation and reducing chemical use, it supports pollinators, reduces runoff, and improves soil health.
Traditional landscapes, especially those dependent on synthetic fertilizers and gas-powered maintenance equipment, tend to carry a higher environmental footprint, especially when you consider the higher water usage required to maintain them. It does have its merits, however; traditional landscaping typically features biodiversity, urban cooling, and erosion control.
Takeaway: For eco-conscious homeowners, xeriscaping aligns better with sustainability goals.
At A Glance
Xeriscaping: Biggest pros: lower environmental impact and maintenance. Biggest cons: You forgo the look of a traditional lawn, which can lower your home’s value; potentially higher upfront cost to establish.
Water Use: Significantly lower. Drought-tolerant and native plants reduce or eliminate the need for regular irrigation.
Maintenance: Time consuming to build, minimal once established. Little mowing or pruning; mulching helps suppress weeds and retain moisture.
Aesthetic Style: Natural, regionally inspired. Incorporates native plants, stonework, and varied textures.
Environmental Impact: Low. Encourages biodiversity, reduces runoff, and eliminates reliance on chemical fertilizers and heavy watering.
Long-Term Costs: Typically lower long term due to reduced water bills and maintenance needs.
Traditional Landscaping: Biggest pros: Traditional look, which adds to your home’s value. Biggest cons: Higher environmental impact, maintenance demands, not visually appealing to all.
Water Use: High. Lawns and non-native plants often require frequent watering, especially in dry seasons.
Maintenance: Ongoing. Regular mowing, fertilizing, pruning, and pest control are typically required.
Aesthetic Style: Classic and manicured. Emphasizes lush lawns, structured plantings, and ornamental features.
Environmental Impact: Higher. Greater use of water, fuel, and chemicals can contribute to a larger ecological footprint.
Long-Term Costs: Generally higher due to water consumption and ongoing lawn care expenses.
Choosing the Right Approach
Whether xeriscaping or traditional landscaping is the better fit depends on certain factors:
Climate: Xeriscaping is a solid choice for dry or drought-prone areas.
Budget: Initial costs for xeriscaping may be similar, but it offers better savings over time compared to traditional landscaping.
Lifestyle: Those seeking a low-maintenance yard may prefer xeriscaping; traditional landscaping appeals to those who enjoy gardening.
Environmental Goals: Xeriscaping better supports sustainability and native ecosystems.
The Bottom Line
Xeriscaping offers a modern, sustainable alternative to traditional landscaping, and for homeowners with certain preferences, it may be the smarter long-term investment.
But desires vary. Whether you're drawn to the neat lines of a classic lawn or the rugged beauty of native plants, the right landscaping choice comes down to aligning your values with your environment – and your lifestyle.
Follow NewHomeSource on Facebook, X, and Instagram, and visit newhomesource.com/learn for more tips and tricks on new homes.
James Klingele
James Klingele holds a Bachelor of Science in Digital Media Innovation from Texas State University. He is a digital media specialist and content creator with a passion for storytelling in both print and digital formats. His work has included covering high-profile events like SXSW, where he contributed to content creation for global audiences. He has been a content specialist for NewHomeSource since 2024.